Although this case has become a talking point across the internet and on many blogs and forums, with many critics blaming the woman for ignoring her own safety to follow directions blindly, Rosenberg’s lawyer Allen Young said the truth was different. The directions Ms Rosenberg downloaded to her phone in January gave directions from one end of Park City to the other however the Google Maps led her to a four-lane street without footpaths. According to the lawsuit filed by the California resident that route was “not reasonably safe for pedestrians.”

Ms Rosenberg states that she did believe she could reach a footpath on the other side of Deer Valley Drive, so she tried to cross the four-lane street however she did not reach the median because she was struck by a speeding car on a pitch-black night. Rosenberg received multiple bone fractures and she required six weeks of rehabilitation.

Her lawyer Mr Young said,” We think there’s enough fault to go around, but Google had some responsibility to direct people correctly or warn them, they created a trap with walking instructions that people rely on. She relied on it and thought she should cross the street.” He also states that Ms Rosenberg is seeking compensation for her medical bills as well as more for lost wages and punitive damages.

Spokesperson for Google, Elaine Filadelfo said “the company had not received a copy of the lawsuit and could not discuss it, but she disputed Mr Young’s assertion that Google Maps provides no warning that walking routes may be missing footpaths or pedestrian areas. Every software version for desktop computers and mobile devices has had that disclaimer since Google Maps was launched in 2008.”

The Park City police also stated that some segments of Deer Valley Drive have footpaths but not the stretch that Rosenberg reached. The street has a walking path on the side Ms Rosenberg failed to reach. Rosenberg’s lawyer said the walking path was “totally snowpacked” and of no use to pedestrians in January.

Picture courtesy of Yodel Anecdotal

This latest death will add fuel to the fair of labour activists who allege Foxconn has a long history of mistreatment of workers and poor working conditions. They claim that the 300,000 employees face tremendous pressure in their working conditions and are pushed hard they also claim that any employees who make mistakes face harsh discipline.

Foxconn, who are owned by Taiwan’s Hon Hai Precision Industry group are yet to make any comment about the death, however after a suicide earlier this month the company said “our workers enjoy world-class treatment, including social responsibility programmes to ensure their welfare.”

The company also produce mobile phones for Nokia, Playstation consoles for Sony and computers for Hewlett-Packard, the most high profile death at the factory happened last July, when Sun Danyong, 25, jumped to his death. He had previously been interrogated over an iPhone prototype that had gone missing, he was responsible for sending the device to US-based Apple.

This is based on the $499 cost for the 16GB Wi-Fi version of the iPad in the States and the fact that Apple products typically don’t cost the same as their US counterparts when they’re released over here:

“An 8GB iPod touch costs $199 in the US and £152 in the UK – a ratio of £0.76 per $1. Meanwhile, a 1.86 GHz MacBook Air costs $1,499 in the US and £1,174 in the UK – a ratio of £0.78 per $1. With that in mind, our bet’s on the entry-level 16GB Wi-Fi only iPad costing around £385, rising to around £640 for a 64GB Wi-Fi + 3G model.”

As for a release date, the homepage of the Apple UK site currently features a large image of an iPad along with the cryptic message:

“A magical and revolutionary product at an unbelievable price. Coming late April.”

This could mean anytime from the the end of this week to the Friday after next (the 30th of April) although Recombu reckons that the iPad could hit the UK on the 24th.

We’re pretty excited about the iPad but our desicion will ultimately rest on the price.

Apart from the obvious danger to the future of our planet dumping a mobile can cause, you are throwing away a valuable asset. You would not consider just throwing £280 out of your car window driving down the motorway would you? Well this is what you can get for certain types of old or unloved mobiles. There are companies that will offer the top price for your old mobile ‘phone and the lists are very impressive.  To give you an idea an apple iPhone could net you £280 whilst a Vertu can bring as much as £197 at present. How about £195 for your old Nokia or £155 for the Blackberry bold? What about £150 for your old LTC- XDA £150 for your Sony Ericsson Satio, or perhaps you have an O2 touch if so you will be £140 better off recycling than putting it into the ground, the list also includes Palm for £129, £128 for an LG, or your Samsung is also worth about£123. These ‘phones are amongst the top ten sellers but the list is far from complete.

Why not use a cash for mobile service if no one wants it and you get cash for doing so, you will be a bit better off and you will be helping to save the planet from those nasty chemicals.

Apple, who manufactures the iPhone confirmed that they are aware of the reports and are waiting for the faulty devices from customers so they can test them. Head of European Communications for Apple, Alan Hely said, “We are waiting to receive the iPhones from the customers,”

Adding that: “Until we have the full details, we don’t have anything further to add.”

It has been reported that the cause of the problem could be the devices lithium batteries, which could overheat.

Last week, a 26 year old security guard from France claimed he was hit in the face and eye with glass when his iPhone screen cracked when he was using it. The unnamed man has said he will seek a full refund and sue for damages.

Apple has sold over 26 million iPhones worldwide since its release in 2007 from its exclusive network deals, which can be obtained straight from the network or through mobile phone comparison sites.

Interesting move and it certainly makes looking for a new mobile phone much easier having all the prices in one place.

Mobiles Please are so confident about their prices they have today implemented a price comparison feature onto the Mobiles Please website comparing themselves to competitors including Dial A Phone, Phones4u, Mobiles.co.uk, Orange and Buy Mobile Phones amongst others.

This is the first time consumers will be able to instantly compare an extensive range of mobile phone handsets and contracts through a retailer’s own website and get the absolute best possible deal. Visitors are able to compare by a multitude of metrics including Networks, Contract length, amount of minutes per-month,  amount of texts per-month, monthly cost and the total cost of the contract over the 12, 18 or 24 month periods.

Making use of the Mobiles Please websites price comparison will really take the guesswork out of finding who is offering the best mobile phone contracts. The service works by pulling data from various affiliate networks then displaying all the contracts available from other retailers on a per-handset basis.

For example I can immediately see I can order a Free HTC Touch HD with Orange including 400 Minutes and Unlimited Texts for £24.47 per-month through Mobiles Please and Beepy offer the same package for £28.53. Both calculated after cash backs.

The economic down turn has forced people into being more careful therefore taking more care when choosing a handset ensuring they get exactly all the features required. Then doing a lot of price comparison on contracts before signing up. This is why we feel it’s important for us to be as transparent as possible by making research easier for our visitors.

The report found that 61% of the people interviewed said that setting up their new mobile phone was more difficult that changing bank accounts. 95% of users also said that they would use new features if the phones were easier to set up.

Many users are finding it difficult to set up their phones and are angry and frustrated by having to look online or call an operator. A spokesperson for Mformation said that it should only take around 15 minutes to set up a new phone, but many users were spending in excess of an hour.

Geoff Blaber a mobile analyst has stated that the operators are trying to tackle the problem, with many training staff and putting help desks in-store, in a bid to persuade users to use the features on their mobiles.

In a statement, Mr Blaber said: “Operators are trying to move revenues away from a reliance on voice and text which are declining”.

And added, “To make that transition they need to be sure that the services are identifiable and easy to configure and use”.